Wednesday, 13 February 2013

The Dying Death Penalty


I saw the essay "An evolving debate: Democracy and the death penalty" in The Economist a few days ago (2013), and since you have already read Levitt's discussion of the death penalty  (Levitt & Dubner, 2006, pp. 124 - 125),  you might like to have a look at it.

The point I thought most interesting, though not directly related to Levitt's discussion, is that a majority of US citizens continue to favour the death penalty, even in states where their representatives in government have abolished it. I rather like this because it shows that in a healthy democracy the government does not and should not simply do what the majority, even a large majority, want. (I think the death penalty is just, but probably better not used.)

Apart from this main focus on the nature of democracy, however, paragraph 7 does discuss issues relevant to Levitt's discussion on pages 124 - 125.

You are, of course, welcome to respond to anything that attracts your interest.

__________
Reference
An evolving debate: Democracy and the death penalty. (2013, February 8). The Economist Lexington's Notebook. Retrieved February 13, 2013 from http://www.economist.com/blogs/lexington/2013/02/democracy-and-death-penalty 

Levitt, S. & Dubner, S. (2006). Where have all the criminals gone? In Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything (p. 117 – 144). London: Penguin Books.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Before you click the blue "Publish" button for your first comment on a post, check ✔ the "Notify me" box. You want to know when your classmates contribute to a discussion you have joined.

A thoughtful response should normally mean writing for five to ten minutes. After you state your main idea, some details, explanation, examples or other follow up will help your readers.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.