Why does Golding go into so much detail when he describes the officers dress? What is its symbolic importance?
Why does the officer mention Coral Island? What does this symbolize?
And what sort of symbol is the cruiser that concludes the story?
The EAP Class Blog at https://
academicaua.blogspot.com for students in Peter's classes.
Anyone can read this Blog; only members can post or comment.
Every year in the UK, more than 25 million turkeys are killed for our Christmas dinner. Is this mass slaughter justifiable merely to satisfy our preference for a certain kind of meat? Shouldn't we be carving nut cutlets instead?The Wilson family are sat around the Christmas dinner table. Dad is carving the turkey when he glances a little apprehensively at his eldest daughter, Gemma.Mr. Wilson: Some turkey, Gemma?Gemma: Of course not. You know I'm a vegetarian.Mrs Wilson: Only since last week. And it's Christmas. Can't you join in just this once?Gemma: No. It's morally wrong to eat meat. I'm not going to do something morally wrong just to make you happy.Much the same conversation will be familiar to parents around the world. Teenagers are increasingly becoming vegetarians, often on moral grounds. It can be irksome for the parents: special meals have to be cooked and time and effort put into making sure that their offspring get a balanced diet.Still, while Gemma's views might be inconvenient, that doesn't make them mistaken. And in fact Gemma does have some rather good arguments up her sleeve. (Law, 2003, pp. 124 - 5)
In his childish way Winston grasped that some terrible thing, something that was beyond forgiveness and could never be remedied, had just happened. It also seemed to him that he knew what it was. Someone whom the old man loved--a little granddaughter, perhaps--had been killed. Every few minutes the old man kept repeating:
'We didn't ought to 'ave trusted 'em. I said so, Ma, didn't I? That's what comes of trusting 'em. I said so all along. We didn't ought to 'ave trusted the buggers.'
But which buggers they didn't ought to have trusted Winston could not now remember.
Since about that time, war had been literally continuous (Orwell, 2008, p. 35 - 36)Discussion Questions
Do you like to go to the movie? Do you often watch films made in your country? Do you buy them? or do you go to see them to a movie theatre? If you buy them, do you buy pirate films?
To go to a movie theatre is a different greater experience than to watch at home a film. At the big screen there are no interruptions of telephone calls, ring door, something more important to do to stop the film, and the most important your five senses are working 100%. I love to go to watch movies at the movies theatres!
The article ¡Acción! in The Economist explain me many question about the Mexican Films I always wanted to know, in particular how is their present situation. It is very interesting to understand the economical development of this Mexican industry because first,
According to the article, the number of Mexican films is increase in the last ten years with the help of the state fund, $73.3m, after a crisis. The industry is not as in “the golden age of Mexican films, between 1940-1955”, when the production was 100 films per years and it was the country’s sixth-biggest industry. The benefit is rare. Marina Stavenhagen of the Mexican Film Institute (Imcine) estimate that only very few films make profit, maybe around ten per year, in despite of Mexico has the fifth highest public in the movie theatres in the world with 4, 500 screens and it is the double than Brazil which has the double of population. There are many raisons. Mexican film benefit depend essentially on the people who go to watch the movies (90%) because of piracy in DVD and actually, the Mexican TV networks competition allow to pay very low rights for every film. The Mexican films are showed very few weeks compare with
¡Acción! More films, more subsidies, elusive profits (Nov 18th 2010) The Economist. Retrieved November 24, 2010 from
I do believe that everyone in this world can remember their father name. There are a group of people, who do not even know or may forget the name of their father. I used to believe that this group is the identity of Thailand until I read "China’s Censors Misfire in Abuse-of-Power Case", which was published by Michail Wines in the New York Times.
The consequence started at one night in October. Ms. Chen Xiaofeng, who was a daughter of poor farmer, was crashed by drunken driver. The driver, whose name is Li Qiming, attempted to escape by speeding up, unfortunately security guards seized him. During the interception, he claimed that he is the son of Li Gang, who is the deputy police chief in the Beishi district of Baoding. Michael mentioned in his article that “The tale of her death is precisely the sort of gripping socio-drama — a commoner grievously wronged; a privileged transgressor pulling strings to escape punishment.”(¶4) After the incident, Communist party tried to conceal and pretended like the accident has never happened. They restrict television network companies about broadcasting the event. The programs, which interviewed victim family, were banned. However, the efforts were unsuccessful, the news rapidly spread in internet and people are interested because the case is about the equality in society. The words “My father is Li Gang” which Li Qiming said when he was arrested, have become a popular over China.
The situation happened in China, likewise, two famous cases in Thailand. The first case is related with son of the member of the house of representative. The powerful man, who was intoxicated, drove through an alcohol checkpoint. He was stopped and forced to do alcohol test. He denied the test and struck a police suddenly, according to the declaration from police. The circumstance was published in every newspaper in Thailand in next day. The privileged son refused the accusation. He declared that police were not impolite and attacked him first. The next case is quite similar. The event was happened many years ago but I do believe that Thai citizen can remember it. It is about a police was shot in the nightclub by the son of politician. The privileged man avoided the detainment by leaving Thailand. His father work hard to help him. At the end, he came back and stay in Thailand peacefully.
The similarities of these three incidents are that all of them are the son of the influential persons and they mentioned that who is their father. This is associated with the equality in society. Mr. Chen Lin, Ms. Chen Xiaofeng’s brother, stated that “In society they say everyone is equal, but in every corner there is inequality, how can you live in this country and this society without any worry?”(¶20) The inequality is likely a culture of developing and undeveloped countries. It is seem like no solution if people in the counties accept this condition. Almost all people do not want to make any problems with powerful one because they have no chance to win. Although commoners win the case, they would get nothing. On the other hand, they waste a lot of money to fight in court and may loss something from vengeances. It would be better if they accept their proposition and sadly feign that the situations have never happened.
Do you think we should let this situation happen again?
What is your solution?
And
If this were happened with a member of your family, what would you do?
For me, as I said this is culture of developing and undeveloped countries so I let it be.
The solution is that I should catch any opportunities to make a good relation with influential persons or become a powerful guy myself. I think this is the best way.
Michael, W. (2010, November 17). China’s Censors Misfire in Abuse-of-Power Case, The New York Times. Retrieved November 20, 2010 from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/18/world/asia/18li.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&emc=eta1