Wednesday, 9 December 2015

Provisional proposition - Na- Right of Non-smokers

Provisional proposition - Na (Right of Non-smokers) 

In the academic writing exercise that is part 5 of chapter 7 of Quest, "Medicine and Drugs: Addictive Substances," Pamela Hartmann asks us to answer one of the questions on pages 224 and 227 (2007).  
  • I have chosen to answer the question:  
     Should the government be involved in the campaign to stop people from smoking? 
________________________________________________
  • My provisional proposition is: 
    Non-smokers must be protected by the government. 
Briefly, I think this is one effective solution (there might be others) because:
  • Smoking causes lung cancer and many other harmful diseases. There is a proven research that the 2nd hand smoker is heavily affected than the actual smokers. 
  • It's a responsibility of the government to provide a harm free environment for non-smokers because they do not consciously making a harmful choice (smoking). 
  • Part of the tax will be used to provide health care for the smokers which is not fair to the non-smokers which are more in numbers.    
________________________________________________ 
___________
Reference
Hartmann, P. (2007). Quest 2 Reading and Writing (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

1 comment:

  1. I've just finished the first draft of my proposition 2, the one where I give a very different solution to Na's, so her supporting arguments are useful for me because they are opposing arguments I need to worry about.

    ReplyDelete

Before you click the blue "Publish" button for your first comment on a post, check ✔ the "Notify me" box. You want to know when your classmates contribute to a discussion you have joined.

A thoughtful response should normally mean writing for five to ten minutes. After you state your main idea, some details, explanation, examples or other follow up will help your readers.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.