In his reply to my comments on his initial clarification of terms, Vee made a comment that I thought was rather good:
Thank you for your comments. According to your comments, I think the controversial word is healing.The text I've marked in bold seems to me to address an important issue, one that applies to all of these questions on controversial issues, and one that it might be very helpful to be clear about so as to avoid an answer that does not actually answer the question being asked. (This might be another good time to use the word not.)
If that is right, I think healing in this term focus on mental conditions of patients, not physical condition.
But I still confuse some points: I think a form of healing is just a process in euthanasia, and euthanasia is more controversial than healing (bold added).
Euthanasia has turned out to be a most controversial issue for many conutries for a long time.
What do you think? What is your response to the important point raised by Vee's thoughtful comment?
Why is matters
You can probably already see from the questions on the list that seemingly academic discussions on the meaning of words can have very practical consequences for people's lives. If you would like another example, from the generally not so exciting world of insurance, answer the following question:
- When terrorists flew planes into the two towers of New York's World Trade Centre on 9/11, 2001, how many events occurred in that attack, or attacks?
How much would you pay out: $3.5 billion, or $7 billion? Both parties were sure that this difference was not a small matter.
For a bit more on this example of the importance of defining terms, see "What does it mean: II - a real and controversial example = 9/11 terrorism insurance" (Peter, 2011).
__________
References
And if you have a question arising from anything we discuss or do in class, please feel welcome to write it up as a blog post to help everyone by giving them a chance to share their ideas on it.
ReplyDelete