Thursday, 24 November 2016

Meeting the Ancestors (not while eating)

Hominin skulls at Dmansi –
1.77 million years old
What I read 
In the Science article "Meet the frail, small-brained people who first trekked out of Africa", Ann Gibbons reports on 25 years of research on early human fossils from a four hectare dig at Dmanisi in modern Georgia (2016). According to Gibbons, the human skulls and other bones, almost 2 million years old, have raised many doubts about older theories about how our ancestors spread out from our origins in Africa more than two million years ago. She reports that we are uncertain why the move occurred, and the mounting evidence suggests that only very simple stone tools were needed for humans to spread everywhere, with our meat eating, which caused appalling dental health, being a major advantage in strange new lands, where we were also often eaten by other animals.
_______________________________________ 

How we got everywhere
My response
I could only very briefly mention it in my summary, which was approaching the 135 word limit, but Gibbons gives a fairly detailed description of the awful condition of our ancestors' teeth and mouths: broken, rotten teeth that were never cleaned, that were covered in plaque fed by the meat, often raw, that our ancestors ate, even from carcasses past their expiry dates. With infected teeth and gums leading to jaw damage and even death from bad teeth, it was not a pretty image to imagine with my morning coffee. At least I wasn't eating dinner at the time. On the other hand, it certainly helped Gibbons to hold my attention as she told of the changing paleoanthropological theories about how we came to be where we are today: for me, having the morning coffee in central Bangkok before I review and revise the day's lesson plan for teaching at AUA. I'm glad I don't have to hunt down a filthy, verminous animal and eat it raw on a bitterly cold steppe before doing whatever our ancestors then did for the rest of the day – I suspect curl up and try to keep warm and not think about the aching ,rotten teeth. But I'm even more glad that they did do what they did: I'm the end result of all of that very long chain of evolution, and had any link not appeared, I would not be here typing on my computer.

Today, there is a Christian
monastery at the Dmanisi site
As I read this article in the magazine published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), I was again reminded of how modest and uncertain science and scientists are: a major point in Gibbon's article is that new discoveries are forcing us to review and revise old theories: what we thought was true really isn't. And this openness to review in the light of new reasons and evidence is a not a weakness but the great strength of science and healthy critical thinking. The contrast with religion, which arrogantly claims to have absolute and perfectly true answers about things could not be greater. The religions are, unlike science, wrong about almost everything. In the beginning, Uranos gave birth to Kronos and the other titans, which children of the god then killed their father. In turn, Kronos, with his sister Rhea, gave birth to Zeus, who promptly imprisoned his father for all time in Mount Tartarus. And then Zeus set about having lots of children (Apollo, Aphrodite, Ares, and the rest) with his wife Hera and other gods and mortals. With such exciting religious stories, is it any wonder that the Greeks brought some healthy skepticism into the world?
_______________________________________ 

Reference

3 comments:

  1. Theories have been changing from one to another when new evidence have been introduced. Well who knows whether these skeleton were even our ancestors. Perhaps they became extinct and don't have any blood related to us at all.

    Eating "carcasses" doesn't sound good at all. They might even eat their own kind.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The trail of evidence seems strong enough that there is no reason, for now, to doubt that they were our ancestors. I don't think any expert has doubted for some decades now that all human beings are the descendants of Africans. In fact, science agrees that every single living thing is related because we are all the descendants of one ancestor about 3.5 billion years ago. All the things we normally think of as alive, all animals, plants, fungi, insects, and so on, are the descendants of a single ancestor about 1.0 billion years ago, when our type of cells (with a separate nucleus and mitochondria) first evolved.

      But it's good that science is open to being corrected as new evidence comes in. That is healthy in the search for truth.

      Delete
    2. It appears I need to update some of my beliefs: I just did a quick check of Eukaryote onWikipedia, and it appears that Eukaryotes have been found in the fossil record a bit earlier, certainly by 1.65 billion years ago, and possibly 2.0 billion.
      SO I've learned something new today, and had a mistaken belief corrected.

      Delete

Before you click the blue "Publish" button for your first comment on a post, check ✔ the "Notify me" box. You want to know when your classmates contribute to a discussion you have joined.

A thoughtful response should normally mean writing for five to ten minutes. After you state your main idea, some details, explanation, examples or other follow up will help your readers.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.