As we have noted, every chapter in Quest includes a response writing activity, such as exercise J. on page 30 (Hartmann & Blass, 2007). These response writing exercises are there because Hartmann and Blass think that they are important for practising fluency in a less strictly academic form of writing. In response writing activities, we are still writing full English sentences, and we do want some organization, but they are responses, not carefully research and planned pieces of writing. Since much academic writing involves citing and responding to the work of others, combining this writing activity with regular reading outside of our class reading also gives practice in reading.
This is our weekly blog schedule.
When it's your day to blog on something in the news, please
Note added July 1:
I usually create my reference list entries in Notepad, and then paste that text into the references section. If you copy and paste from sources, the formatting can be weird. Doing it in Notepad removes all the formatting, leaving only the text, which will then be fine when pasted into your blog post. But don't forget to add italics where needed and to make the URL an active link.
This is our weekly blog schedule.
Bloggers | |||||
Monday | A | Nid | Yuko | Pu | Apple |
Tuesday | Akira | Pat | Bright | Taey | Book |
Wednesday | Apple | Petch | Joe | Tarn | |
Thursday | Book | Pu | Natt | Tum | A |
Friday | Bright | Taey | Nid | Yuko | Akira |
Saturday | Joe | Tarn | Pat | ||
Sunday | Natt | Tum | Petch |
When it's your day to blog on something in the news, please
- choose an article from one of the publications on my "Looking for Something to Read?" list on our class blog. You may blog on an article from elsewhere, but it must be from a publication at a similar standard, which rules out The Nation and The Bangkok Post, although you are very welcome to respond to something in those papers as an extra post if you like.
All of the publications on my list have articles on a wide variety of topics, so you should have no trouble finding some that interest you, whether because you agree, disagree, think it funny, or interesting for any other reason. - follow the suggested organization, but don't worry too much about it. That is, begin with a very short introductory paragraph that at least introduces your source, and perhaps explains why it caught your interest as something to respond to; follow with a short summary paragraph that tells us the main points that you want to respond to; and then move on to your response to the ideas in the article, which should be more than half of your total post and one or two paragraph, although you can write more if you like.
- it is a good idea to make the title of your source in the introductory paragraph a link
- you are citing a source, so you must write a reference list entry. These are important academic writing skills that we want to practice in these response writings, even though the writing itself is not as rigorous as academic writing. Again, in your reference list entries, make the URL a link.
Note added July 1:
I usually create my reference list entries in Notepad, and then paste that text into the references section. If you copy and paste from sources, the formatting can be weird. Doing it in Notepad removes all the formatting, leaving only the text, which will then be fine when pasted into your blog post. But don't forget to add italics where needed and to make the URL an active link.
__________
References
Hartmann, P. & Blass, L. (2007). Quest 3 Reading and Writing, (2nd. ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
I think it's good idea for me and everyone in this reading and writing class because we have more oportunities to practice our writing skill(,but it might be fairer, if we begin writing next week because if we begin TMR, I have to write 2 times this week. T_____T) Your idea is greatfull, indeed. However, I've one question to ask you. You said we can use every source that appear in "Looking for something to read", right? but if I use TED at Youtube, don't it miss our concentration in our class which is reading and writing? Is it better if we use only the source that available to read only? It's just my idea. Could you please clearify my couriosity?
ReplyDeleteTum,
ReplyDeleteI agree for the reason you give that you should not use TED talks for your source when you are doing one of your allotted response writings. However, if you watch something on TED and would like to respond to it simply because it's interesting that would be fine. There are some great talks on TED.
But I don't agree that we should wait until next week.
Don't you change your mind? May i give you a chance. ToT
ReplyDeleteThanks for the chance.
ReplyDeleteDo you have any stronger supporting reasons?
I don't think that twice this week will convince me; I set up the schedule so that everyone would get two opportunities in every 7 day period. I think that Apple and Book have the strongest grounds for requesting a review: their two days are closer together than yours and everyone else's.
But I'm open to strong reasons.
My example response post is immediately below: "Supreme Wisdom or Super Silly?".
ReplyDeleteIf you would like another example, try "Remembering Ourselves", which we looked at last week.
thank you for your advice, peter. Both of them are very helpful.
ReplyDeleteI've made a small change in response to Tum's query @ June 30, 2010 3:19 PM. The reading list no longer includes the link to TED at YouTube, which has been moved to a more appropriate new section. I'll add a couple of other links there later.
ReplyDeleteI've also changed the way those links function: they will now open in a new browser tab when you click them normally so that the blog page remains open, allowing you to more easily switch between our blog and a source.