I think that "Such talk in a constitution
seems to me [italics added] a serious threat both to democratic principle and to moral good," (Filicietti, 2014) includes a phrase, the one I've italicized, very much like Law's "I suspect" (2003, p. 128). And as Pa-naeng reminded us yesterday, exam questions very often use such language as:
In your opinion,
Do you think,
Give your opinion,
Do you agree, and so on. Clearly, such language is used and is presumably thought useful in academic settings.
I thought (!) it might be useful for us to discuss some of the issues raised a little more. For example, what exactly is an opinion? What does the noun
opinion mean? In my opinion, we might also find it useful to explore how these sorts of question relate to what academics, including ourselves, do. When, where and why do we use the sorts of phrases that prompted Pa-naeng's questions? When, where and why
don't we use such phrases?
But feel welcome to respond with whatever idea comes to your mind, whether a statement or a question.
Filicietti, P. [Peter F AUA]. (2014, March 25 at 8:30 AM). Re: In court we trust [Blog comment].
Class Blog - AEP at AUA. Retrieved from
http://peteraep.blogspot.com/2014/03/in-court-we-trust.html
Law, S. (2003).
The Xmas Files: The Philosophy of Christmas. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Before you click the blue "Publish" button for your first comment on a post, check ✔ the "Notify me" box. You want to know when your classmates contribute to a discussion you have joined.
A thoughtful response should normally mean writing for five to ten minutes. After you state your main idea, some details, explanation, examples or other follow up will help your readers.
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.