According
to “They
grew up as American citizens, then learned that they weren’t”, Justin
Ki-Hong (33) adopted in 1985 from South Korea to the US has found he is on the
verge of being deported from the USA where he has lived as an American for his
life time because adoptive parents didn’t know the adoption law in the 1980’s. After
The Child Citizenship Act went into effect since 2001, more than 100,000
international adoptees under 18 who were already in the US automatically received
the US citizenship; however, over 18 years old adoptees at that time hadn’t
received that benefit. The number of adoptees who are in trouble is more than tens
of thousands adoptees from Venezuela, Germany, India, Guatemala, Vietnam and Iran
and Korean international adoptees is estimated up to 18,000 and the article
showed different cases like Justin Ki-Hong (2016)
_______________________________________
My Yes/No question is:
Should the US government give adoptees the US citizenship?
My answer is:
Yes,
because they are Americans, the US government should revise the law
immediately and make them feel pride in Americans.
Support
In “Total Recall” (1990), “Oblivion”
(2013), “Maze Runner” (2014), there are people who don’t remember who they were
and what they were doing in the past. Their memories were, however, technically
erased and skillfully implanted with new memories by secret groups which could
have probably worked for the government and whose work is covering the
government’s dirty faces. Even though they don’t know how to remember and
regain their erased memories, they are struggling to find and know who are they
and try to do everything they can.
People were adopted into the US family have
remembered everything what they have done so far and who they were and are, so
they don’t need to try to reveal and investigate their past and their authentic
nationalities. They are absolutely Americans not stateless people. Nonetheless,
because their parents hadn’t known the fact that they had to change and submit
the documents, adoptees are in hot water. It is an unbelievable story, yet I would
rather talk about people living in Korea than talk about US people related to
this story. Because adoptees were once Koreans and they were abandoned by whom
people had given birth to.
Abandoning baby is not a private matter,
yet a social issue. There is a box named of “the Baby Box” and was prepared by a
church located in Seoul, Korea. It is neither a cradle nor a baby carrier. It is
a special box equipped with a bell and a life support system, a.k.a., an incubator.
When people put a baby into the box, they are encouraged to put a memo written down
baby’s birthday and ring the bell so that people inside the church can hear the
sound of the bell for 24 hours and rescue a baby immediately. It wasn’t there until
December 2009. A church set up the baby box to rescue abandoned babies who
might have died in the street. After installing the incubator box, abandoned babies
come from not only Seoul, but also other cities. According to the church, roughly
300 babies are abandoned per year, and more than 900 hundred babies are put into the box from 2010~2015 in South Korea. Even though the church involved in
social service is trying to rescue abandoned babies, some human rights
organizations in Korea criticize the baby box because the church is doing not only
illegal behavior, but also instigation of illegal delivery which could sever
the chance to meet between moms and babies in the future. However, in despite
of criticism by the human rights groups, the church needs more facilities for
abandoned babies because the number of abandoned babies into the box increases sharply
annually.
The South Korean government should
actively deal with this problem. South Korean’s international adoption had
started just after the Korean War in 1953. After the Korean War, mixed-blood
children were sent to abroad under the pretext of returning to father’s country,
so South Korea could have dealt with the problem of war orphans and curtail expenditure
of social welfare. The government, then, enacted the special Act on orphan in
1961 and they prepared for the legal foundation of international adaptation. In
the middle of 1970’s, South Korea sent more than 5,000 children to foreign
countries annually and just before the Olympic Games, 8,837 Korean children
were sent to overseas in 1985. Before the South Korea holds the Asian Games
in 1986 and the Seoul Olympic Games in 1998, many people and human rights groups criticized an
international adoption is one of South Korea’s export goods. The South Korean
government then severely considered not to export Korean babies to overseas and
tried to reduce international adoption. The administration of Kim, Dae-Jung and
Noh, Moo-Hyoun declared the government tries to reduce the number of
international adoptees remarkably. However, it has failed. According to the US government report, South Korea took fourth place; China, Ethiopia, Russia, followed
by South Korea, from 2009 to 2012 and the number of adoptees is more than
20,000 babies from 1999 to 2015.
Ironically, even though there are many
abandoned babies waiting for their new parents, the South Korean government has
been promoting the increase of the birthrate since in the middle of 2000’s because
the birthrate of South Korea is the tailender in the world with Japan,
Hong-Kong, and Singapore. In recent years, many do not, on the one hand, want
to get married and give birth to babies because of economic difficulties, on
the other hand, some indiscreetly had a meaningless sex and have babies. A lot
of abandoned babies are delivered by single mothers whose age ranged from 15 to
20. They are to be blamed at and should take responsibilities for their
behaviors that are extremely imprudent and unwise. They had to abort their babies
at the initial stage although the South Korean government bans women from
aborting their babies except for special occasions. (According to “The Mother
and Child Health Law”, the abortion is permitted in following cases, including
rape, incest, hereditary disorders, and when the mother's health is in mortal
danger). On account of their reckless decisions and momentary pleasures of the
body, they make lots of people settle problems and the government spends the taxes
in the social welfare services. What is more, South Koreans ought to change
their mind in some ways. Most Koreans, for example, have a tendency not to adopt
children and they think their legitimate son can only succeed to their lineage.
It shows the number of overseas adoptions is far bigger than the number of
domestic adoptions.
___________
Reference
Abortion law. (2016, September 2). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
Retrieved 14:54, September 5, 2016, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abortion_law&oldid=737335168
Bahrampour, T. (2016, September 2). They grew up as
American citizens, then learned that they weren’t. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/social-issues/thousands-of-adoptees-thought-they-were-us-citizens-but-learned-they-are-not/2016/09/02/7924014c-6bc1-11e6-99bf-f0cf3a6449a6_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_adoptees-8pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory#comments
International adoption of South Korean children.
(2016, August 22). In Wikipedia, The Free
Encyclopedia. Retrieved 14:14, September 5, 2016, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=International_adoption_of_South_Korean_children&oldid=735763793
Nixon, R. (2009 November 8). Adopted From Korea and
in Search of Identity. The New York
Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/09/us/09adopt.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1
Oblivion (2013 film). (2016, August 26). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
Retrieved 14:39, September 5, 2016, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oblivion_(2013_film)&oldid=736288642
The Maze Runner (film). (2016, September 4). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved
14:45, September 5, 2016, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Maze_Runner_(film)&oldid=737694618
Total Recall (1990 film). (2016, August 31). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
Retrieved 14:40, September 5, 2016, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Total_Recall_(1990_film)&oldid=737130446
Jay's wide ranging responses to his source present some interesting, and controversial, issues to comment on.
ReplyDeleteFirst is the idea popularised in the films Jay mentions. When it first came out, I thought that Total Recall starring Arnold Schwarzenegger (thank goodness for spell checking) was a great film that combined some serious action with an exciting story that raised challenging questions about what it is to be a person. I think that if we lose our memories or have them replaced then we really do stop being the person that we were before. The film brings this out very well with the full, independent personalities that sequentially inhabit the same body because of changes made to the brain. This reminds me of horrific diseases like Alzheimer's, which destroy the person whilst leaving the human body. And this has a connection with some of the ideas in Stephen Law's essay "Carving the Roast Beast." What do you think?
And Jay ends with some comments on the ever controversial topic of abortion. Again, I think that there are also connections here with the arguments developed in Law's essay. Since abortion benefits many and normally harms none, it's hard to see how laws that do not allow women to have an abortion on demand could be morally justified, at least for a foetus before six months. Law does not directly address this issue, but one of his cited sources received death threats because of the logical development of the argument partially given Law's long quotation from his work. Which of Law's cited sources is this, do you think?