Sunday, 27 September 2009
Alina agree with Stephen Law on eating meat
I agree with Law’s essay on eating meat. First of all I don’t like eating meat, I agree that eating meat is morally wrong. Some people think that we need to eat meat, because meat can produce proteins. But I think we can eat other things to instead, like egg and legume. I don’t agree that animal’s life is different from the human’s. All of the living things have their own life. We don’t have power to deprivation their life. I think we don’t need meat. Because in the pass our ancestors didn’t eat meat. But later they began to eat meat because there was no food. So I think we can live without meat if we didn’t eat meat before. So I agree that eating meat is morally wrong.
1 comment:
Before you click the blue "Publish" button for your first comment on a post, check ✔ the "Notify me" box. You want to know when your classmates contribute to a discussion you have joined.
A thoughtful response should normally mean writing for five to ten minutes. After you state your main idea, some details, explanation, examples or other follow up will help your readers.
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I'm glad that someone agrees with Law, and with his main supporting points.
ReplyDeleteAs we saw before, there seems to be a lot of disagreement about the human need for meat. I think we will look at this question in class next week, using Euy's cited source as a useful example.