Aor's agree eating meat really is immoral

The writer of the article in the philosopher Stephen law tries to convince people to stop ating animal's meat and change to consume vegetatios instead of them. He provides many argument issues that eating meat really is immoral. After reading, I obviously agree that turkey's life are not enjoyable. Besides, Gemma's data, turkeys must be debeaked because of protecting injure in fighting each other in the limited areas. After trimming their beak, They will get pain all their life as same as phantom pain in amputated men. It is not justified to them. This uncomfortable symptom in human is important treatment for health care providers to be concerned when they take care patients. On the other hand, miserable pain in animals is not realized which nobody pay attention to relieve this to animals. Although, Mrs Wilson argue this issue that slaughter can help them not cruel. But if human can avoid to eat poultry, feeding animals in farms will not occur, animals will have natural lives which not get miserable from acting of human. This issue make me unhappy to eat meats but I cannot do it because I am un comfortable to cook or buy vegetarion meals instead of general meals.