Saturday 26 September 2009
Near disagree with Stephen Law on eating meat
His arguement is not convince me because i'm still believe in my mind that eating meat is not immoral. Most people can grow up and stay healthy because they had eat meat when they were child. Do you think if babies eat only vegetables and nuts or another kind of protein except meat, is it enough for grow up? Exactly no because children need a lot of protein to develop their brain and meat is full of protein that why people should eat meat. And do u think when Gemma was a child, is she eat meat? You can be a vegetarian if you are over 40 years but if you just 20, it's not good to be a vegetarian because you are too young. You still need meat to grow. Another point to consider is Priest also eat meat too. You know, Priest can't do anything that morally wrong that why they can eat meat? Just one answer because eat meat is not immoral.
2 comments:
Before you click the blue "Publish" button for your first comment on a post, check ✔ the "Notify me" box. You want to know when your classmates contribute to a discussion you have joined.
A thoughtful response should normally mean writing for five to ten minutes. After you state your main idea, some details, explanation, examples or other follow up will help your readers.
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I agree with you. It is a very good idea.
ReplyDeleteI also agree that humans need protein, but I don't agree that we need animal protein. Why do you think we need animal protein and that vegetable protein is not enough?
ReplyDeleteHint: what did Euy's cited source say about this question?
Many Buddhists monks (is that what you meant when you wrote "priests"?) do in fact believe that it is morally wrong to eat meat, whilst others think it is morally right. One group must be wrong. How can we decide which group of Buddhist monks are right?
Near,
I like the ideas you've presented for discussion. They are good responses to Law's essay: they show that you have read it and thought about the issues that Law raises, although he does in fact discuss both of the ideas you present.
Although I do think it is morally OK to eat meat, I don't agree with your reasons. Can you make your reasons stronger?
Or maybe someone else would like to help develop and support teh excellent ideas that Near has presented in her blog.