What I read
In "Anger at Uganda's tax on social media"(2018) says that some Ugandans are unhappy with
taxation on using social media. They have to pay 200 Uganda Shilling [$0.05,
£0.04, ฿1.71] tax on
social networking services. According
to the member of Uganda’s government, the use of social media became taxable by
the reason that the government wants to control negative criticism and this kind of levy could be the new source of state revenue
which the government will use for public interest. However, the opponents
believed that the new tax law is enacted for the only reason to limit their freedom of expression.
___________________________________
My response
From my viewpoint, imposing tax on
the use of social network indirectly limits the right of Uganda’s netizens
because the country’s GDP per capita is about $662.1(2016) [฿21,969.31] and the yearly minimum wage is around $95 [฿3,154.66]. How can the
Ugandans afford to pay the price? We may think that ฿1.71 tax is a
small amount of money which anyone in our country could afford to pay, but for
Ugandans, I think that is really hardship. In addition, internet access is
human rights, so no one in Uganda should struggle with using social media.
As some say that, this tax legislation could help the country boost
state revenue. I strongly disagree with this statement because there are
several sources of incomes which collected as the state’s revenue such as personal
income tax, corporate income tax, customs duty, VAT, excise tax and so on. It
is unfair to impose any burden on the use of social media because anyone can
use it for free.
___________________________________
My question
Should government control the internet?
___________________________________
Reference
- Anger at Uganda's tax on social media. (2018, July 2). Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-44682345
First of all, this news is really new to me, thank you for sharing this interesting one on the blog. For the question that you have asked above, I think that action of Uganda government is a sign of deprivation of the right of people in Uganda so I think that the government should not do that to their people. This is true because every individual should have freedoms to do whatever they want as long as it is not harmful to someone else, and I personally respect every action of any person that does not offend another because I think that every people has their own reasons that results in different actions. Thus, the reason of the action taken, which given by the Uganda government, that they want to limit the negative criticism is unjust to me because everyone has rights to to do everything they need as long as it is legal. Moreover, the government should listen to criticism of their people and take it as a suggestion to improve the way they govern that country to meet people's need.
ReplyDeleteI think using social network and internet access would be useful for people in the country, we can use it for education, knowledge,health care, career or seeing what in the world is going on, etc. Everything has both positive and negative parts, for me, it would be better to have free access to the internet. And if it is about the rights, freedom of speech is the basic right in democracy.
ReplyDeleteI don't think this is to limit people's expression. People who are willing to pay what is required can still use the social media and post whatever they want. It is just a way the government see as another source of income. Perhaps, other type of tax might generate limited income since the country is poor, if I'm not mistaken. Theoretically, those money the country receive will be allocated to help improve citizen's lives in one way or another. If the Uganda's government impose the tax and its people still want to use, these people will just have to hope the money they pay will somehow benefit them.
ReplyDelete