Poupee's excellent post on Obama's support for same-sex marriage against traditional cultural norms and against traditional religious teaching raised several questions that force us to think critically about number of issues in addition to the question of whether or same-sex marriage is moral or not (Puppy Poupee, 2012). To highlight one of those relevant issues, I tried to think of an example and then did a search for a BBC News story on it, which led me to "Food: Organic growth?", which was published, a few weeks ago, on April 25.
In this article, Richard Black reports on studies comparing organic farming with intensive modern agriculture (2012). The results are clear: intensive farming produces substantially more food than do organic methods, making it more likely to actually be able to feed the world's burgeoning population, although critics rightly argue that intensive techniques are harmful to insect species such as bees and contribute to wider ecological imbalances through the nitrogenous fertilizer run-offs. Further, the smaller, labour intensive nature of organic farming appears to have some social benefits, such as employment.
The reason I've chosen to blog on this topic is that it conveniently exemplifies the question of natural versus unnatural which came up in Poupee's blog on same-sex marriage, especially in the discussion. The connection with organic farming is clear: many people support organic farming and consumers willingly pay higher prices for organic foods solely because it's seen as more natural than intensive farming's use of technology such as fertilizers, pesticides, heavy machinery, and the like. The underlying feeling seems to be that natural equates with good. But is this right?
As Black's article clearly suggests, if we want to actually produce food efficiently, the natural, traditional methods of organic farming are bad news: they are more expensive, use more resources and are unlikely to be able to successfully produce enough food to feed the world well. That is, the artificial, unnatural methods of human culture and ingenuity seem superior to the far more natural and traditional methods of the organic farming movement favoured by deluded consumers with much money and little sense and by dishonest political manipulators who push things like organic farming and small, sufficiency scale production to keep farmers poor and under control.
And the specific question I wanted to discuss is: Does being natural equate with being good?
Even if, for example, heterosexual sex and lusts were natural and homosexual sex and desires unnatural, would that be in any way relevant support for either?
My own opinion is that the common thinking on these questions is completely wrong, but what do others think?
Black, R. (2012, April 25). Food: Organic growth? BBC News. Retrieved May 15, 2012 from
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-17829764
Puppy Poupee. (2012, May 12). Obama says same-sex marriage should be legal.
Class Blog - AEP at AUA. Retrieved May 15, 2012 from
http://peteraep.blogspot.com/2012/05/obama-says-same-sex-marriage-should-be.html