Do you agree with Law that eating meat is morally wrong?
I disagree with the law that eating meat is morally wrong because meat is source of human nutrient. Women need 46 grams and men need 56 grams of protein per day. Protein are found in meats, fishes, nuts, eggs and milk. Meats are made from cows, porks or sheeps. These animals can’t live in the wild because they need feeding from farmer. They can’t live without human, so they are our food at the end. However, human shouldn’t eat wild animal because they are not human nutrient. Eating meat isn’t morally wrong because some animals born to be human food.
Sunday 9 November 2008
2 comments:
Before you click the blue "Publish" button for your first comment on a post, check ✔ the "Notify me" box. You want to know when your classmates contribute to a discussion you have joined.
A thoughtful response should normally mean writing for five to ten minutes. After you state your main idea, some details, explanation, examples or other follow up will help your readers.
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Did you read my comments on your classmates' ideas before thinking of your own very different opposing argument to Law's idea that eating meat is morally wrong?
ReplyDeleteWhat do you think of the most popular idea so far, that it's OK to eat meat because we need it?
i agree with you,Nan but how you sure that some animal born fo human' foods? and do animals can't live if human doesn't feed them? i think that animals can live without human because they live in nature for long time ago. they can live which follow nateral law that is ecosystem.
ReplyDelete