According to "Joss Stone death plotters win appeal", two men from Manchester were convicted of conspiracy to murder and rob the singer at her Devon home, but they were arrested before starting so the lawyers were involved in. Lawyers representing Liverpool argued a life sentence was wrong, while Bradshaw's legal team said he had been enlisted into the plan by Liverpool.Nowadays, this problem is very common all around the world because every life is not the same. There are both rich and poor people that cause many following problem such as dissatisfaction and greed which leads to jealousy. I think that they just want more money for their lives sometimes concerning their wife and son problems. If you meditate on this kind of problem, it might be sympathized; however, I don't think it is a good idea to get more money from this kind of conspiracy. They should be punished for sure but at least depending on what they did because time is very valuable if they have to live in jail for a long time.
This problem won't be solved everlastingly because it is nature of the world regarding every type of people. Solving this problem, to get it covered as much as possible, you should be watchful to know what is going on in your life. Consequently, they should be punished even if they lack of money for avoiding this problem.
__________
Reference
The idea in Leo's concluding paragraph (para. 4) reminds of one of the arguments that Gemma's family presents, and which Law, whose ideas are represented by Gemma, answers.
ReplyDeleteWhat do you think? What's the opposing argument to Law's main idea? Does Leo's idea here support Gemma or her family? Does it support or rebut Law?
With fifteen minutes before class starts and with my lesson plan already done, I had a second look at Leo's post, and it occurs to me that there might be a more serious problem related to the connection I saw with Law's ideas.
ReplyDeleteIf it's true as Leo writes that "it is nature of the world regarding every type of people" (para. 4), then should we punishing people at all? If something is natural, doesn't that mean it's not their fault, but the fault of the nature that made them the way they are? Should, we for example, punish people who have lost their legs in accidents for moving too slowly on the footpath? This would seem unfair, since it's not their fault they are moving slowly, but a consequence of the way they naturally are.
Yes, I think it should depend on what people think. It is not necessary for making the best one decision. It is nature, right?
DeleteI've now done my bit of quick response blogging for the day.
ReplyDeleteHave you done yours yet?
Not yet, but I will. see you
Delete