Monday, 19 May 2014

Think Green

A non-renewable resource or finite resource, which cannot renew itself, is a one of the most important energy resource in the world. Fossil fuels, for example coal, and natural gas, are being consumed every day by human, so fossil-based resources will become rare and too costly. In the future, we might never see cheap gasoline again.



According to UK "needs more home-grown energy", the UK is one of the most energy secure countries in the world, but in five years later, Britain will have run out of oil, coal and gas. Now, the UK is leading globally on energy security and in getting a deal in the EU to cut carbon emissions by 40% by 2030.


Fossil fuels can produce significant amounts of energy. When I was young, Natural gas seem to be useless, but Natural gas is now considered a very valuable resource in 2014. I learned about Hydrocarbons in Chemistry lecture room last year. Fossil fuels are Hydrocarbons which have many formula, so I cannot remember all of them and I got bad grade in Organic Chemistry. I also learned about renewable energy which might be a new good resource for the world. Renewable energy has many advantages, for example it produces little or no waste products and it will never run out. The first thing I think about renewable energy is solar energy, this energy comes from the sun which mean we don’t have to find it. Every country in the world can use solar power, so we don’t have to make war to get it.



Another power that saves on raw materials and provide large amounts of energy is nuclear power. It has the lowest impact on the environment because it does not produce Carbon Dioxide and any gases. The other advantage of nuclear energy is that it gives powerful and efficient than other alternative energy sources, because of these advantages many countries are putting huge investments in nuclear power. However, costs of nuclear power plants is very expensive, and nuclear waste is hard to destroy. Nuclear power plants might be targets for terrorist.


There are many ways to save energy. For example, turn off any appliances you are not using, turn off your computer not leaving the screen saver on because it will not save any energy. You also can use Reduce, reuse, recycle method, which is an easy method to conserve energy. Saving energy is good for you, your country, and our world.

__________
Reference
UK "needs more home-grown energy". (2014, May 16). BBC News Science & Environment. Retrieved May 19, 2014 from http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-27435624

4 comments:

  1. Apart from nuclear power, I think we have wind power, solar energy, and water energy. I don't really like nuclear power because it's too dangerous if the workers are not skilled enough. The best way may be solar energy, it is clean and never runs out, especially in Thailand, our solar energy could power the whole country, judging from the light and temperature.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I not agree that solar power can power entire country because We spend 5 or 6 months in a rainy season which is not quite sunny.

      Delete
  2. I wonder: is it true as Bank writes in his concluding sentence that "saving energy is good for you, your country and our world"?

    As I read it I was reminded of the ideas with a long history in economics (Mandeville, Adam Smith, Hume, Keynes) that luxury, and extravagance, and even wastefulness, can be very good: if people want to use more resources to live more materially rich lives, such as drinking Blue Mountain coffee and enjoying the convenience of having their computer and other tools or toys always on, it stimulates improvement, creates more employment, leads to improved technology, and over all increases wealth for a nation. Surely these are good things? If silly aristocrats did not want to show off in the first horseless carriages, would we have cars and buses today?

    On the other hand, if we all make do with less, might that not suppress an entire economy? This reminds me of economists today who worry when consumer spending falls because that reduces production, which reduces employment, which pushes families into poverty! And that's a bad thing. Might we not, in fact, have a duty to consume more to help the national economy?

    And I think there is a connection here with some ideas in Wann's latest post: if people stopped eating the pretty awful stuff served at McDonalds, KFC and the like, how many employees would lose their jobs, and have no wage, high or low? Should governments perhaps be encouraging more fast food consumption, smoking and so on to help national economies?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My last comment started with thinking that I never turn off my computer and other things, and am very wasteful with air-conditioning. But I don't think using less is necessarily the best solution, even though it would selfishly save me some money.

      Delete

Before you click the blue "Publish" button for your first comment on a post, check ✔ the "Notify me" box. You want to know when your classmates contribute to a discussion you have joined.

A thoughtful response should normally mean writing for five to ten minutes. After you state your main idea, some details, explanation, examples or other follow up will help your readers.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.